> BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t require a
> whole Randori-like plug in. Falcon should be able to swap in for MXMLC
> with fewer changes.
I could be wrong but if the name and location of the compiler and the API is
the same (to be sure, check the idea-flex-compiler-fix.jar), why not !?
We could have 1 build configuration for swf, one for js I guess.
There would still be some IDE inconsistencies though I guess like the Wizards
and others, Intentions could be the same I guess
> I did notice that Alexander Doroshko is watching the FDB bug. I was going
> to suggest to you that you put in a comment on that bug asking him to
> participate on this thread. Or didn’t somebody file a feature request in
> IntelliJ’s bug base asking for FlexJS support? Maybe we should put in a
> comment on there.
Mike called him yesterday on the jetbrains issue tracking for the FlexJS issue
but he said he had a look but hadn't got the time to read it all.
Also, that's 1 year or so now, I can see almost no effort anymore pushed into
Flex from Jetbrains :(
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:37:56 +0000
>
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 9:03 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >It was a revert of the previous commit because I used IntelliJ the code
> >cleanup function which touched all the files, the following commit
> >59659f7cc66a20a9450d4a3117a5f999f1fa41c7 shows that only DebugCLI and
> >Extensions was touched.
> >
> >In this case, it could be that because the IJ Flex Plugin reconized the
> >FlexJS SDK as a Flex SDK, it applied a fix it had for FDB that wasn't in
> >correlation with the last version because it couldn't determinate it.
>
> Ah yes, I see that now. I wonder if there is some other explanation for
> the FaultActions exception? The window where FaultActions was changed was
> small. Anyway if folks have it working then it doesn’t matter.
>
> BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t require a
> whole Randori-like plug in. Falcon should be able to swap in for MXMLC
> with fewer changes.
>
> I did notice that Alexander Doroshko is watching the FDB bug. I was going
> to suggest to you that you put in a comment on that bug asking him to
> participate on this thread. Or didn’t somebody file a feature request in
> IntelliJ’s bug base asking for FlexJS support? Maybe we should put in a
> comment on there.
>
> -Alex
>
>
