The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-)
If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes because it can't find
IStateClient2
Frédéric THOMAS
[1]
Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73) at
org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeNodeStream.nextElement(CommonTreeNodeStream.java:104)
at org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.fill(LookaheadStream.java:113)
at
org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.syncAhead(LookaheadStream.java:107)
at org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.LT(LookaheadStream.java:129) at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSTree.stylesheet(CSSTree.java:200)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSDocument.parse(CSSDocument.java:81)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache$CSSDocumentCacheKey2.parse(CSSDocumentCache.java:280)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryValue(CSSDocumentCache.java:323)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryValue(CSSDocumentCache.java:54)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.get(ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.java:69)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSManager.getCSSFromThemes(CSSManager.java:251)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.collectThemes(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:553)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.findAllCompilationUnitsToLink(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:493)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.buildAllCompilationUnits(Target.java:297)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.getBuiltCompilationUnitSet(Target.java:306)
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.SWFTarget.build(SWFTarget.java:228)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildSWFModel(MXMLC.java:760)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildArtifact(MXMLC.java:746) at
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:625) at
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:611) at
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:230) at
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:198) at
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.execute(MXMLC.java:185) at
flex2.tools.Tool.compile(Tool.java:62) at
flex2.tools.Mxmlc.mxmlc(Mxmlc.java:72) at
com.intellij.flex.compiler.flex4.Flex4Handler.compileSwf(Flex4Handler.java:81)
at
com.intellij.flex.compiler.CompilationThread.run(CompilationThread.java:48)
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:29 +0100
>
> > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces,
> > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme
> > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a
> > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag.
>
> Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that it has its own rule to write
> its config.xml, the only way I guess would be a plugin to override its
> behaviour.
>
> > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work.
>
> I can try that
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000
> >
> > Hi Fred,
> >
> > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces,
> > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme
> > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a
> > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag.
> >
> > I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the SDK folder will convince
> > IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest into mxml-manifest.
> >
> > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work.
> >
> > Thanks for digging into this,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Actually, it is more complicated.
> > >
> > >This is what it is generated by IJ:
> > >
> > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d
> > >
> > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one overrides
> > >the one of IJ apparently
> > >
> > >it results:
> > >
> > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 errors and 11
> > >warnings
> > >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
> > >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > >MyModel.
> > >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not
> > >be found.
> > >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could not be resolved to an
> > >ActionScript class. It will be ignored.
> > >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml
> > >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not
> > >be found.
> > >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > >MyModel.
> > >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > >MyModel.
> > >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'.
> > >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'responseText'.
> > >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'strings'.
> > >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to
> > >detect assignments to 'allData'.
> > >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController.as
> > >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not
> > >be found.
> > >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > >MyModel.
> > >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > >MyModel.
> > >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method
> > >MyModel.
> > >
> > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc :
> > >
> > >-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\flex-co
> > >nfig.xml"
> > >-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest.swf
> > >-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest.swc
> > >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
> > >
> > >It builds.
> > >
> > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the framework, it results in
> > >compilation error because it can't find mxml-2009-manifest.xml neither
> > >the bundle resources, actually, the locale folder in my FlexJS SDK is
> > >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my Flex SDK, the compilation
> > >fails because the
> > >it can't find the components from the
> > >D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spark.cs
> > >s
> > >
> > >Frédéric THOMAS
> > >
> > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to compile swc and js
> > >>files from IntelliJ.
> > >>
> > >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to have things
> > >>green though, also, despite, it passes a correct config.xml, the MXMLC
> > >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib (the class is in the lib and
> > >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with both include path and external
> > >>and had the same result), did someone already tried this kind of config ?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> > >>
> > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100
> > >> >
> > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does it
> > >>get
> > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use a modified
> > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change getCompilerConfiguration
> > >>to
> > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and store
> > >>the
> > >> > > config someplace.
> > >> >
> > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config and still make
> > >>IJ happy.
> > >> >
> > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these
> > >>things in
> > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library within a
> > >> > > regular Flex SDK?
> > >> >
> > >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into either, we still
> > >>need to add the FlexJS Lib + FlexJS SDK
> > >> >
> > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> >
> > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you look at
> > >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe there is code in
> > >>there
> > >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, then populates
> > >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a legacy
> > >>Configuration
> > >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, IFAIK, I can't use
> > >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does it
> > >>get
> > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use a modified
> > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change getCompilerConfiguration
> > >>to
> > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and store
> > >>the
> > >> > > config someplace.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile from IntelliJ
> > >>to .swf
> > >> > > >/ .js
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these
> > >>things in
> > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library within a
> > >> > > regular Flex SDK?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it build with Ant
> > >>tonight
> > >> > > >though, I'll keep you in touch.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hey, this is great progress. I’m going to be a while on the FDB for
> > >> > > Falcon so no hurry.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Alex
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
