Good. All of these pieces seem to be Apache compatible. We still need to figure out how to create the two SWCs in an Apache-compatible way, but I don’t expect to get blocked there.
-Alex On 5/29/15, 1:05 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: >Of the main repo README >" > >This project is licensed under the MIT license. > >Copyrights on the definition files are respective of each contributor >listed at the beginning of each definition file. > >" > >Mike > > >On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Michael Schmalle ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> >> >>https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped/blob/master/canvasjs/canva >>sjs.d.ts >> >> For example. >> >> Mike >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> If I understand, you are planning to grab a d.ts file from somewhere >>>and >>> translate it. Give us an example of one you plan to use. It should >>>have >>> a header in it or some licensing associated with it. That’s the info >>>that >>> will help determine if it is “safe”. >>> >>> On 5/29/15, 12:49 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >Well, if it's Apache safe I am already planning on writing a parser >>>and >>> >renderer to .as files. >>> > >>> >So someone that knows, should investigate because I have no idea about >>> >licenses. >>> > >>> >I was actually thinking about writing it in TypeScript because I >>>think it >>> >has it's own parser. I am investigating this, if not I will write a >>> >tokenizer in Java or something. >>> > >>> >Mike >>> > >>> >On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> This would be really helpful! I'm all for piggy-backing off the work >>> the >>> >> TypeScript community did (with proper credit where it's due, of >>> >>course), so >>> >> that we don't need to start from scratch. >>> >> >>> >> - Josh >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Michael Schmalle < >>> >> teotigraphix...@gmail.com >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Hi, >>> >> > >>> >> > Is this considered reverse engineering? >>> >> > >>> >> > Does it violate Apache's terms in anyway? >>> >> > >>> >> > Mike >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >>> >>
