BTW, assuming we’ll have Mike’s AS to JS compiler, the JS files will soon
be generated by running a CompC like tool.  I had thoughts of teaching
CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output
option, but ran out of time.

-Alex

On 6/1/15, 11:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>> The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too
>pass, I guess it can refrain the users, I would like to make it more
>friendly:
>> 
>> - compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL,
> calling chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file
>first
>> - add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes
>
>It seems I won't have to do the second item.
>Instead I created a /ide/IntelliJ/flex-config.xml that overrides as
>needed the intelliJ one, doing so, we benefit of the IntelliJ
>configuration too, the override can be done, per module or per project,
>this one is more convenient when the project contains only FlexJS
>relative stuffs.
>
>I would have liked its option to include files into the swc be as smart
>as the include-files but it is not, it doesn't remap the entry, it only
>includes the file with the same path.
>
>So, I still need to implement the first item.
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
>> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 20:30:45 +0000
>> 
>> I'm in favor of automating any repetitive process. Things are the way
>>they are due to lack of time.
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>> 
>> 
>> ------ Original message------
>> 
>> From: Frédéric THOMAS
>> 
>> Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 1:24 PM
>> 
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org;
>> 
>> Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
>> 
>> 
>> It worked better but compilation failed with one error but the problem
>>hasn't been reported, I will have to dig into.
>> 
>> The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too pass, I
>>guess it can refrain the users, I would like to make it more friendly:
>> 
>> - compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL,
>>calling chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file
>>first
>> - add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes
>> 
>> Thought ?
>> 
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>> 
>> > From: aha...@adobe.com
>> > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
>> > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:33:04 +0000
>> >
>> > The swcs we build use include-file in compile-config.xml. we
>>currently run compc after compjsc.
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>> >
>> >
>> > ------ Original message------
>> >
>> > From: Frédéric THOMAS
>> >
>> > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 12:28 PM
>> >
>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org;
>> >
>> > Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
>> >
>> >
>> > > Is this with ij or ant as well?
>> >
>> > I build the lib with IJ using the default flex-config.xml and no
>>other argument, it results in a swc without the JS, adding
>>-js-output-type=FLEXJS, I get the js, my question was, is there already
>>something to build the swc included the js (and catalog updated I guess)
>>?
>> >
>> > >From ant we build framework swc and compile apps
>> >
>> > I didn't get that !?
>> >
>> > Frédéric THOMAS
>> >
>> > > From: aha...@adobe.com
>> > > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
>> > > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:21:22 +0000
>> > >
>> > > Is this with ij or ant as well? From ant we build framework swc and
>>compile apps
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ------ Original message------
>> > >
>> > > From: Frédéric THOMAS
>> > >
>> > > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 11:58 AM
>> > >
>> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>;
>> > >
>> > > Subject:[Falcon.jx] -library-path
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I was trying to compile an App with a Lib in FlexJS and seen few
>>things:
>> > >
>> > > - The MXMLFlexJSPublisher doesn't pass the the ProblemQuery to
>>GoogDepsWriter.getListOfFile, we end up with a NPE (easy to fix)
>> > > - The addDeps() throws a RTE instead of a Problem, what do we want
>>as Problem here ?
>> > >
>> > > Adding models/MyModel.js to the swc didn't work for me, I didn't
>>check but my guess is because it was not added to the catalog ?
>> > >
>> > > How am I suppose to proceed to compile in the same time my swc / js
>>and having it included ?
>> > >
>> > > Frédéric THOMAS
>> >
>> 
>                                         

Reply via email to