> >From my perspective FlexJS AND FalconJX(vanilla), specifically the AS3
> >language has an up hill battle because, we are not evolving the language
> >like TypeScript and such and all the other techs.
>
> Yeah, people like new, but Java is still being used in lots of places.
Java is here since 1985 IIRC and has more than 3 people working on the
compiler, it evolved a lot :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 00:37:08 +0000
>
>
>
> On 6/2/15, 4:48 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I wish we could get more help from them.
> >
> >Sad but I am sure a true fact, companies go after the market share and I
> >don't think IJ takes FlexJS seriously. I am a man of honesty and that is
> >the way I see it.
>
> True. But often, selling upgrades to the installed base is a good revenue
> source.
>
> >
> >From my perspective FlexJS AND FalconJX(vanilla), specifically the AS3
> >language has an up hill battle because, we are not evolving the language
> >like TypeScript and such and all the other techs.
>
> Yeah, people like new, but Java is still being used in lots of places.
>
> -Alex
>
