OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff. On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex, > >Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" for >your function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe >seing your solution will unligthen me but at the moment I'm totally in >the dark. > >Frédéric THOMAS > > >---------------------------------------- >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:30:27 +0100 >> >> >> Ok will try but with no guaranty :-) >> >> Thanks, >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> ---------------------------------------- >>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ >>>Integration >>> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:25:13 +0000 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/10/15, 6:37 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Alex, >>>> >>>>I've been reading the instructions before but was a bit confused the >>>>same >>>>:-) >>>> >>>>Well, the annotated tree seems to be well constructed by the label(): >>>> >>>>FunctionCallNode(FunctionCallID) "$obj" 0:1 loc: 1-15 abs: 1-15 >>>>flash.tools.debugger >>>> IdentifierNode(IdentifierID) "$obj" 0:1 loc: 1-5 abs: 1-5 >>>>flash.tools.debugger >>>> ContainerNode(ContainerID) SYNTHESIZED 0:5 loc: 6-15 abs: 6-15 >>>>flash.tools.debugger >>>> NumericLiteralNode(LiteralIntegerID) Number 88737825 0:6 loc: 6-14 >>>>abs: 6-14 flash.tools.debugger >>>> >>>>I've got 1 subtree for the identifier and 1 for the container, none for >>>>the NumericLiteralNode though, is that expected ? >>>>Also, for sure I don't get all of this but to me what it describes is a >>>>function, so, I wonder, shouldn't it have a return value node ? >>> >>> No, the return value is not in the expression, it is the result of >>> evaluation the expression, so it is the output of the reducer. At >>>least, >>> that’s how I understand it. >>> >>>> >>>>I didn't get either at what moment and from what, after the reduction, >>>>the expected result of $obj(LiteralIntegerID) is supposed to come from >>>>? >>>> >>>>Out of that, the exception is thrown because after the call to label(), >>>>the reduce()->reduceAntecedent()->getRule() fails to find a rule to >>>>apply, actually, it can't find the cost for rule as it seems to be no >>>>cost function for the goalState 1, at least in the class >>>>JBurgAnnotation_FunctionCallID_2_n. >>> >>> OK, at least you are getting a JBurgAnnotation_FunctionCallID_2_n. But >>>I >>> see now that the object reference # is few enough digits to be parsed >>>as a >>> LiteralInteger, where for me I end up with more digits so it gets >>>parsed >>> as a LiteralDouble, so I have to add a reduction for your kind of tree. >>> >>> Unless, of course, you want to try to fix it yourself. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >> >
