> I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :)
Oh yes, I don't want to miss that either, big up for you too Mike !!
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:06:59 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Great job Fred, so this means we just need the FlexJS SDK and it will work
> right? Do we still have to setup a library for code completion etc.?
>
> I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :)
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I understand what you did but not sure I could reproduce, I wasn't that
>> far in my experiment but I still miss the complete round trip logic of
>> jBurg, I guess I would need to spend more time on it to get it better.
>>
>> Whatever, that's awesome, we can now compile and debug without any
>> dependencies on the Flex SDK in IntelliJ :-) big up !!
>>
>> I will commit soon what I've done too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>>> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:19:47 +0000
>>>
>>> OK, I think I got it. Try my latest commit.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 6/12/15, 12:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff.
>>>>
>>>>On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Alex,
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" for
>>>>>your function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe
>>>>>seing your solution will unligthen me but at the moment I'm totally in
>>>>>the dark.
>>>
>>
>>
