On 6/19/15, 12:16 AM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi, > >> It sounded like we’d burn credits if we sign an RC and >> then have to sign a subsequent RC if the first RC doesn’t get approved >>by >> our PMC. > >As far as I’m aware there’s a test process which costs nothing, and it >also costs if we (Apache as a whole) don’t use it. > >> So I think we finish up the usual process then get it signed. > >That sounds possible, but I’m not sure how we would show that the >binaries are the some ones or if it would require another VOTE. Our binaries have MD5 hashes. Anyway, I have no objection to you or somebody taking the next steps with Infra to find out more explicitly what our next steps are. It just isn’t clear to me that this signing needs to be done before release approval. -Alex
