GCC no likey ;-) Can I maybe have a look at the example project? I've been gone for a while, but if I'm correct I should be able to get the latest stuff from Git, build and then compile this AS project from the command line, correct? Or do I have to set it up in an IDE? That would mean a large hurdle to get back in the game for a bit :-(
EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Yeah, I think that’s at least one issue. HTMLContainer.js is a transpiled > extern and we aren’t putting them in the externs list in the publisher. > > -Alex > > On 6/30/15, 7:05 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >Is there a handwritten or transpiled "HTMLContainer.js" to go with that? > >Or > >am I missing something? > > > >EdB > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > > >wrote: > > > >> > OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes, the above is what > >>I > >> > see in the output. > >> > >> Yes, it was a conversation about private, protected members, maybe > >>that's > >> why. > >> > >> > The release version of my test app does get called and executed by the > >> > browser. Maybe post the html that was generated? > >> > >> the AS3: > >> https://paste.apache.org/6gCj > >> > >> The Debug HTML: > >> https://paste.apache.org/1MwN > >> > >> The Debug JS: > >> https://paste.apache.org/7QgT > >> > >> The Release HTML: > >> https://paste.apache.org/j903 > >> > >> The Release JS: > >> https://paste.apache.org/jdJR > >> > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------- > >> > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but > >>we > >> now have 1.9 in AS > >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:30:16 +0000 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 6/29/15, 1:17 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > >> >>>>Now, if I run the index.html from js-release in the browser, I got > >> >>>>"Uncaught ReferenceError: Main is not defined" whatever start() is > >> >>>>public > >> >>>>or not. > >> >>> > >> >>> I will take a look. Interestingly, I cannot duplicate the > >>constructor > >> >>> containing the private function body, so I don’t know why you are > >> >>>getting > >> >>> different results than me. > >> >> > >> >>The constructor does contain a private function body here, but a > >>public > >> >>function: > >> >> > >> >>>> private function start():void { > >> >>>> HtmlContainer.load([JQUERY_SCRIPT], run); > >> >>>> } > >> >> > >> >>is translated to: > >> >> > >> >>/** > >> >> * @private > >> >> */ > >> >>Main.prototype.start = function() { > >> >> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], Main.run); > >> >>}; > >> > > >> > OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes, the above is what > >>I > >> > see in the output. > >> > > >> >> > >> >>and there's is no compile time check for start() called from the html > >> >>script because > >> >>this one is not compiled by jscomp. > >> >> > >> >>I was thinking and hoping we had some runtime enforcements but > >>realized > >> >>we have none, > >> >>the opposite could have make me love more JS whenever I had to debug a > >> >>FLEXJS output > >> >>type only application. > >> > > >> > Well, IMO, in most cases you won’t need runtime enforcement because, > >> other > >> > than this particular entry point, all other code paths should get > >>checked > >> > by the compiler. If you want to add a specific check for the entry > >>point, > >> > that’s fine with me. > >> > > >> > The release version of my test app does get called and executed by the > >> > browser. Maybe post the html that was generated? > >> > > >> > -Alex > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Ix Multimedia Software > > > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >3521 VB Utrecht > > > >T. 06-51952295 > >I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
