Justin, Can you please make the changes and we can then review it again? It would be easier that way.
Thanks, Om On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > It is always hard to know what the “right” thing to do is, but note that > > in [3], sebb recommends listing non-ASF AL2.0 dependencies in LICENSE. > > Which probably doesn’t apply here as it’s a different situation i.e. in > that case the font in question is a binary file whose license wasn’t > obvious as you need to look at the font meta data in order to determine > that. > > > Well, that is reasonable reasoning, however, our last advice on this > topic > > is here at [4] which would imply no change to NOTICE. > > Again this applies to bundling a binary font file which is different to > bundling several source files with Apache headers. > > Thanks, > Justin
