I hope to release the first version of my dts2as tool soon. I haven't finished testing it yet.
- Josh On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > So I assume that takes care of the package-level getter/setter issue > > right? There really shouldn’t need to be package level getters and > > setters if we can create classes like goog.events, which IMO, better > > mirrors what is actually happening in JS (where goog and goog.events are > > actually objects). > > Yes, it does, thank ! > Another thing is the legacy compiler allows to have getter / setter at > package level, not Falcon. > > > Do you still have the missing goog.require problem? > > Yes but I will fix that, the compiler.clients.* used directly does not > create the issue. > > > Yes, I’m merging in your changes right now. > > Ok, just take note that I kept only Application in basic-manifest.xml, > removed the -source-path option for the only purpose of being focussed on > compiling only that class and its components, doing so, I wasn't bother by > any other compilation issues of the classes I hadn't been converted yet. > > > I’m wondering why you decided to make such a “complete” GCL.swc. I’m > > tempted to make a much smaller one that just has the few classes we need, > > then we don’t have such a huge pile of custom code to maintain. I made > my > > own stubs last night and it was only four small files so far. > > My dream would have been that the EXTERNC compiles all the GCL, it was far > to be able to do it, at the point that instead of trying to improve it, I > took what it has generated and used it in a new GCL project, so, not sure > we need all the GCL JS sources I committed, not sure either, at the end, I > added more AS classes than what I need, could be though... > > Btw, Josh started to build a tool to cross compile typescripts extern > libraries to .swc, not sure how much progress he did on it though but it > would be awesome for other libs because the number of them is impressive. > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error) > > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:43:52 +0000 > > > > > > On 9/17/15, 9:32 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> I’m interested to see what you put in GCL.swc. I created a few stubs > > >>for > > >> the calls I needed and also changed the compiler so it will allow > > >> goog.events.fireListener to be a class called goog.events with a > > >> fireListener member and not fail by assuming goog.events was a package > > >>and > > >> not finding the fireListener class. > > > > > >After having cherrypicked your fix, I added a goog.events class and > added > > >a static getter / setter and t made the trick ! > > > > So I assume that takes care of the package-level getter/setter issue > > right? There really shouldn’t need to be package level getters and > > setters if we can create classes like goog.events, which IMO, better > > mirrors what is actually happening in JS (where goog and goog.events are > > actually objects). > > > > Do you still have the missing goog.require problem? > > > > > > > >I committed GCL, read the commit comments and come back to me if you > need > > >more details. > > > > Yes, I’m merging in your changes right now. > > > > I’m wondering why you decided to make such a “complete” GCL.swc. I’m > > tempted to make a much smaller one that just has the few classes we need, > > then we don’t have such a huge pile of custom code to maintain. I made > my > > own stubs last night and it was only four small files so far. > > > > > > -Alex > > > >
