It would be great if you could split the tests up in unit-test and 
integration-test.
This way the unit-tests could be executed every time and the integration-tests 
once every day.

Just give us targets to build with unit-tests but without integration-tests and 
we should be fine.

Chris

________________________________________
Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2015 21:24
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

I guess the silence on these threads mean that folks are waiting for me to
make it easier to build the artifacts, so I am going to spend some time
there looking for quick fixes so we can get this stuff to our customers
and Chris can then do a more significant refactoring of the builds.

It is difficult for me to know what the starting point people want to
have.  I am going to assume you have Ant, Java, Flash and AIR and
environment variables and paths set up for them.

My current thinking is that by removing integration tests from the “all”
target, Falcon should build without dependencies on flex-sdk and
flex-asjs.  Does that sound reasonable?  I’ll put those tests in another
target.  Chris can move them to a new repo later if he wants.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 10/5/15, 9:09 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>I found a few issues with the Falcon automated tests on Windows and fixed
>them.  Maybe that will unblock the folks who were having build issues.
>
>The latest builds are available via the Installer and on the now-working
>apacheflexbuilds VM.  Please try it, and let me know if there are other
>issues.  I’d like to get a release out ASAP.
>
>Thanks,
>-Alex
>
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild
>/
>artifact/out/
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBui
>l
>d/artifact/out/
>(we will only vote on the falconjx artifacts)
>
>On 9/28/15, 8:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>Who is still having problems and can I get console logs for those
>>problems?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-Alex
>

Reply via email to