On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/20/15, 9:05 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>I took a look at one of the bad.png files from Charts and the fonts were > >> rendering differently, although I also think I saw a small difference in > >> the chart lines as well. For Charts, it would be a good idea to verify > >> that the fonts are embedded and being used correctly before cutting new > >> baselines. Any volunteers? > >> > > > >I will take a look. > > I decided to take a quick peek. It looks like a change was made to have > charts use mx:Label instead of s:Label by default. That could result in > some surprises for folks who haven't embedded non-CFF fonts in their apps. > The mustella tests embed both CFF and nonCFF fonts and thus only see > subtle rendering differences between TextLine and TextField. > > I'm a bit worried about the backward compatibility impact. What do others > think? Of course, I could be wrong... > > For me, this fixed a major issue with Charts. So, I am okay with this. I am used to adding the same font twice, once as CFF and once as nonCFF. IMHO, this is not a big deal. I believe this is one of those times where only Mustella would complain :-) Thanks, Om > -Alex > >
