Cause I had mentioned this not only once but even more than twice and none was objecting so I thought there was a general consensus on this. Discuss as long as you want ... I won't do anything till that discussion is over.
Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> Datum: 15.12.2015 22:28 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Remove the Ant scripts from BlazeDS? Chris, Can we have a discussion on this topic first? I would like to know what are the consequences of removing Ant scripts from BlazeDS. Alex had mentioned that they are indeed working on the CI server. Why would we want to delete things that are working? I am confused. Can we (not you, someone else) update the README to clarify how to make the Ant script work? That way those who want it can continue to use it. Not everyone uses Maven. There are still lots of people using Ant. I don't think removing Ant support is a good idea. Thanks, Om On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > ________________________________________ > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2015 22:21 > An: 'dev@flex.apache.org' > Betreff: [VOTE] Remove the Ant scripts from BlazeDS? > > Hi, > > > to start this discussion again (I think I mentioned this several times > before ... this time will be final though). > > > BlazeDS is currently Built by Maven ... all needed for this is contained > inside the "modules" directory. Additionally there is an Ant build around > that, which I have never gotten to work (Probably I had only set 4 or 5 of > the 20 Environment Variables ;-) ). Whenever I work on BlazeDS, I use just > Maven and nothing but Maven. Just recently some of our users had been > confused about how to build BlazeDS. > > > I would like to remove everything outside the "modules" directory and make > the content of the "modules" directory the new root ... is this Ok for you? > > > Chris >
