TLF Rendering speed was improved. On 1/7/16, 5:04 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1 Binding > >Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65" >MD5 checksum matches >Good signature >Source kit build successful >Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0 and ant frameworks-rsls. >Build successful. >Flash Builder likes the new SDK. >Recompiled existing large Flex web application, everything runs fine >Recompiled exisiting large Flex mobile application, everything runs fine > >(App seems to be running faster. What did we do??) > >Thanks, >Om > >On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala ><bigosma...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> +0 Binding >> >> Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65" >> MD5 checksum matches >> Good signature >> Source kit build successful >> Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build >> successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but >> Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' >>and >> AIR version 16.0 was downloaded. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> Package >>> >>> >>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-s >>>dk- >>> 4.15.0-src.tar.gz >>> Java 1.7 >>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>> Source kit signatures match: y >>> Source kit builds: y >>> README is ok: y >>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>> NOTICE is ok: y >>> LICENSE is ok: y >>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>> No unapproved binaries: y >>> >>> Package >>> >>> >>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apac >>>he- >>> flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz >>> >>><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apa >>>che-flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz> >>> Binary kit signatures match: y >>> NOTICE is ok: y >>> LICENSE is ok: y >>> No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y >>> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y >>> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y >>> >>> Thanks for being the RM. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >>> >>> >Hi, >>> > >>> >This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the >>> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README. >>> > >>> >The release candidate can be found here; >>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/ >>> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/> >>> > >>> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF >>>requirements on >>> >approving a release?", at: >>> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release> >>> > >>> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >>> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct >>> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >>> >- That you can compile from source package >>> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice >>> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser >>> >application >>> > >>> >Please vote to approve this release: >>> >+1 Approve the release >>> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why) >>> > >>> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. >>> > >>> >The vote passes if there is: >>> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >>> >- More positive votes than negative votes >>> > >>> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please >>> don't >>> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we >>>want >>> to >>> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of >>> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote >>>during >>> >the voting process. >>> > >>> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release >>>and >>> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how >>> the >>> >PMC votes. >>> > >>> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR >>> >version you tested the SDK with. >>> > >>> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread >>>not >>> >this VOTE thread. >>> > >>> >Thanks, >>> >Justin >>> >>> >>
