I've been wondering if there should be a "Client" track as an umbrella for both Flex and Cordova talks. Especially since FlexJS Mobile is output via Cordova. If folks think that's a good idea I will hit up the Cordova folks I know to see what they think.
-Alex On 1/8/16, 1:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >A track makes it easier to get at least enough talks for the track >selected. Without a track it has to sort of fit into another track. >Depending on how they cut the tracks this could be difficult. We we want >to go for a track, I could re-submit updated versions of my last >submissions regarding BlazeDS and FlexJS support in Maven. > >But my stomach sort of tells me that it could be difficult to get a track >as the attendee numbers weren't great last time. That's why I was >intending on submitting something Flexy under the hood of a different >track (After all ... the (mobile) frontend and backend (BlazeDS) will be >Apache Flex) ;-) > >If we want a track, I could try to take care of this ... but only if >there is interest in this ... I remember feeling left a little alone with >the content at first for ApacheCon EU last time (Thanks to Justin and Om >it wasn't a big problem though :-) ) > >Chris > >________________________________________ >Von: omup...@gmail.com <omup...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash >Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 00:57 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics? > >On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 1/7/16, 3:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" >> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending >>on >> >what others are doing. >> > >> >Should we ask for a Flex track here as well? >> >> Don't we have to have a track to get Flex sessions accepted at all? >> > >Not necessarily. If we have a track, there is a better chance of Flex >talks being accepted. If we don't, then it is up in the air as to which >ones get selected. At least, that's the impression I got from the >ApacheCon EU selection process. > > >> >> You seem a bit more interested in the JS.swc usage. Do you want to do a >> session on that? >> > >Sure, that would be fun. We need to come up with a cool name for 'JS.swc >usage'. We have been lumping everything under FlexJS, which seems wrong. > >It would be nice if someone else did a talk on Flex Mobile. Any takers? >You don't have to be a committer or a PMC member to give a talk. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> >> -Alex >> >>
