On 2/10/16, 2:47 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>One of the big use cases to use strict equality is with Numbers and
>Strings when you want to exclude 0 and empty strings.
Sure, but in my testing, checking against null with "==" works just as
well if the type is known.
>
>The reason this came up now is based on my work with E4X.
>
>If I’m reading the spec correctly, it differentiates between namespaces
>with prefixes which are undefined and prefixes which have an empty
>string. To test whether the prefix string is undefined or an empty
>string, I need strict equality, and I was not sure as to whether to test
>for null or undefined.
I think the first issue is the data type. If you can expect undefined,
then the type should be "*" if null is a separate allowed value.
Otherwise I think if you use String and "==" you'll be ok. Or does that
not work somewhere?
>
>I guess I can always initialize the prefix of namespaces as null. (i.e.
>private var _prefix:String = null;)That will cross-compile correctly.
>Right?
Yes, it should.
>
>Actually, I just did some tests with JS and it looks like I’m not totally
>clear on how JS handles null and undefined in comparisons:
>var a = "";
>alert(a==null)//false
>alert(""==null)//true
I did not get this in JSFiddle.
HTML:
<span id="out" />
JS:
var foo;
var bar = "0";
var baz = 0;
var empty = "";
var s = "";
s += (foo == null) ? "foo == null<br/>" : "foo != null<br/>";
s += (bar == null) ? "bar == null<br/>" : "bar != null<br/>";
s += (foo === null) ? "foo === null<br/>" : "foo !== null<br/>";
s += (bar === null) ? "bar === null<br/>" : "bar !== null<br/>";
s += (baz == null) ? "baz == null<br/>" : "baz != null<br/>";
s += (baz === null) ? "baz === null<br/>" : "baz !== null<br/>";
s += (empty == null) ? "empty == null<br/>" : "empty !=
null<br/>";
s += (empty === null) ? "empty === null<br/>" : "empty !==
null<br/>";
s += ("" == null) ? "'' == null<br/>" : "'' != null<br/>";
document.getElementById("out").innerHTML = s;
>
>var a = "";
>var b;
>alert(b==null);//true
>alert(b==undefined);//true
>alert(b=="");//false
>alert(b==a);//false
This is what I would expect.
-Alex
