On 2/24/16, 8:15 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Well I am using my mavenized sdks my sdk-converter provides me ... and I >have all of these resource bundles available. > >Anyway ... I just finished releasing a new version of JBurg, that no >longer has the classloader issues the 1.10.2 version had (JBurg 1.10.2 >used the system classloader to load stuff, in maven we have a fine >hierarchy of classloaders, so changing this to the current threads >context classloader resolved all issues I had). Paralel to that I did a >first release of the jburg-maven-plugin (version 1.10.3 to match that of >jburg). I also updated the versions in my branch. So you should be able >to get the same results as I am having ... Well not quite ... thinking >about it ... I still have the debug-player path hard coded :-( > >But I'm currently writing a simple DMG file decoder to read the >debug-player dmg images. With that I'll be able to finish the >sdk-converter to package the runtimes. As soon as that's done I can >change the tests to auto-download the runtimes and as soon as you update >the flash.version property, it will automatically run the correct player >version :-) I am trying to make sure this is ok with Adobe. There are currently some concerns. > >It finally feels like I'm getting somewhere :-) > >Now I have to convince you how awesome Maven is ... well I hope it will >do the convincing on it's own :-) This process of incremental changes and incremental education is what works best for me. I don't have to block out whole days to try to learn something that won't stick in my head. I can learn stuff as needed. I still don't have time and money budgeted for a full-day training on Maven at ApacheCon. I don't know if other folks who might go to ApacheCon have the budget for it either. I'm sure Maven is awesome, but if I can use it more as a black box, it is better for me right now. -Alex
