Hi, Sorry -1 binding due to possible license issues and unable to compile from source. Willing to change vote to +1 if these are sorted.
I checked: - Signatures and hashes good - Source NOTICE is OK - Source LICENSE has some minor issues (see below) - Binary NOTICE is OK - Binary LICENSE same mine issues as source and missing Flat UI font licenses - Docs LICENSE file is incorrect as it list things it doesn’t contain - Docs NOTICE is OK - Docs NOTICE and LICENSE good - All source files have Apache headers - Unable to compile from source not sure what the issue is - may be Java version related I see a lot of projects using sha rather than md5 these days, md5 is considered not as secure as it once was. We may want to consider this for future releases. Source LICENSE refers to frameworks/projects/Flat/as/defaults.css this files doesn’t exist I assume it is frameworks/projects/Flat/src/main/resources/defaults.css instead? Source LICENSE refers to examples/native/USStatesMap/src/MapCoords.js this file doesn't exist I assume it is examples/native/USStatesMap/src/MapCoords.as instead? (note different extension) In the binary it’s a little unclear how the the flat ui font files are licensed (flat-ui-icons-regular.eot, flat-ui-icons-regular.swf, flat-ui-icons-regular.ttf, flat-ui-icons-regular.woff, lat-ui-icons-regular.svg), it look like they may be under a non commercial CC license. The AS docs LICENSE looks to be incorrect as it’s a copy of source one and list things not contained in the package. Thanks, Justin
