And how about this for an idea? I will cut an RC3 tonight that is the same package but without the crypt folder? We can still get it 72 hours of voting in before the event.
Thoughts? -Alex On 3/31/16, 3:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >Which podling removed Google closure library? I'd to read their reasons. > > >Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > >------ Original message------ > >From: Justin Mclean > >Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2016 2:43 PM > >To: dev@flex.apache.org; > >Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC2 > > >Hi, > >> Those files are bundled from Google Closure Library. I opened a ticket >> [13] to see if they have or require an ECCN. In looking at the code, it >> doesn’t. > >How do you come to that conclusion? [1][2] > >> Did you see anything that would require it? > >As I said I’m not 100% sure. [3] Another project in incubation with >similar code removed it recently. I can see it does contain pbkdf2 which >is used to create keys for asymmetric encryption algorithms. It also >contains AES which a symmetric encryption algorithm and it supports 256 >bit encryption. (That’s more than the 56 bits mentions in [2]). I’d ask >on legal to be sure. > >Thanks, >Justin > >1. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_State >s#Classification >2. http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html#classify >3. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_State >s#Current_status
