I think this is not what I'm talking about. In Falcon and ASJS we have a lot of xml config files. Unfortunately most of them (if not even none) use an XML Schema to define their content. This makes it difficult to write tools and maintain content. So my question was: 1) Is there a schema for manifest and config-xml files? 2) If there is, why aren't we using them? 3) If there are none, how about writing and using ones?
Chris ________________________________________ Von: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 15:34 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] No Namespaces? I’m not sure if you were talking about the same thing, but this is the discussion I was thinking of: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flex-dev/201511.mbox/browser On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Would be interested in a pointer to that discussion ... cause the only > benefit of leaving them away is that it makes less fuss in writing the files, > but on the downside there is a large amount of downsides: > - No tool support (IntelliJ can't help you detect things that are wrong) > - Makes writing parsers harder (I'm currently starting to work on automated > config generation ... that's difficult if there's no schema) > - I don't know which options there are ... all I have are examples that I > have to extract what they mean. > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 15:07 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] No Namespaces? > > There was discussion on the topic in the past. IIRC, it was a conscious > decision to not use namespaces. I don’t remember the reason. > > Harbs > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> I'm currently working on migrating the build of the framework projects in >> the flex-asjs project to build with the flexjs-maven-plugin. I noticed one >> thing, that most of our config files don't have a single namespace >> declaration. Is this just because of lazyness, or don't we have schemas for >> them? I'm currently talking about the compile-config xml files and the >> manifest files ... >> >> >> Chris >
