I think Material is probably a better option. Bootstrap is kind of a thing of the past these days, at least the default look and feel.
Almost all frameworks (Angular 1/2, React, etc.) have some level support for Material Design. Thanks, Om On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Good ideas, however, our CSS implementation on the SWF side isn't yet > capable of the advanced CSS in Bootstrap, and the component > implementations for Bootstrap are more than a single HTMLElement. I think > we are looking for someone to help with improving the look of our simple > implementations. We can try to approximate BootStrap, FlatUI, Material if > folks think that would be good enough. > > -Alex > > On 6/14/16, 12:30 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I think the styles should closely match Bootstrap (or maybe use > >Bootstrap). > >Material Design is another good target. > > > >On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:34 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm working on making the FlexJS examples look better via CSS. I'll > >>most likely check in a separate branch, but I thought I'd ask you all > >>what your expectations would be. > >> > >> Keep in mind that the basic (HTML project) component set is meant to > >>provide ActionScript wrapping for HTML elements - for the most part. For > >>example, <js:TextButton> yields a <button> and <js:Label> yields <span> > >>elements. These HTML elements are easily styled with CSS, so the styling > >>objective here is CSS. > >> > >> Skinning, or more advanced styling, would be accomplished with a more > >>complex component set. Those skins might be SVG for instance. But the > >>version I'm working on is the basic set using simply CSS styling. > >> > >> Reply to this thread to get the discussion going. If we come with a > >>nice looking style sheet, we can make that the default for FlexJS. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Peter Ent > >> Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project > >> > >> > > > >
