Actually, I saw note saying that Google Closure Library has this capability, and it is under Apache License 2.0. It is in the crypt.js but doesn't seem to have any crypto code in it, so it might be easier to copy it.
-Alex On 7/1/16, 7:39 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Thanks for the links. I looks like the unlicensed license is a derivative >of the CC0 license, so if I’m reading it right, it’s binding and about as >permissive as you can get. > >I’m not clear on what you are suggesting we do. I’d like to pretty much >include some of the code (with minor modifications) in an ActionScript >class. What would we add to where? If we need to add something, I thought >NOTICE made sense, but I’m not very clear on these things. > >On Jul 1, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Is there any problem just adopting the part of the code relevant to >>>UTF8? Do we need to add a notice? >> >> Not that I can see but public domain is complex [1], but adding >>something to LICENSE is the current advice. It would be best to get [2] >>added to [3] and/or [1] by asking on legal discuss. >> >> I can’t see any reason why it would not be added/accepted. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. >>http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#can-works-placed-in-the-public- >>domain-be-included-in-apache-products >> 2. http://unlicense.org >> 3. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >
