So I can take care of ordering the repo ... id call it "flex-typedefs" ... is 
that ok? We'll refrain from renaming the others for now and just keep in mind 
that it would be cool to rename them some day.


Chris

________________________________
Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 21:22:36
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [Falcon] What would be needed in order to release two tiny 
parts of Falcon?

Hi Alex,

the difference is that the externs will change, the "tiny parts" of Falcon will 
probably never change. That's why I would simply like to fire them out the door 
and only think about them if we really need to change something.

Chris

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 21:20
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Falcon] What would be needed in order to release two tiny 
parts of Falcon?



On 7/15/16, 11:38 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>
>In order to do a proper Maven release, there cannot be any SNAPSHOT
>dependencies in it. Currently we have these two snapshot versions in
>there. By releasing the artifacts in version 1.0.0 and leaving it this
>way, the road is clear to do a release of falcon. The other thing I
>would like to have done before triggering the release would be to
>detach the externs. I would like to have them in a separate repo for that.
>

I don't think there were any objections to getting a new repo for the externs, 
so please ask Infra for it.  I'm still not sure it is worth the cost of 
renaming the flex-asjs and flex-falcon repos.  If we do get a separate repo for 
externs, would we want to have it be a separate release (with LICENSE, NOTICE, 
README)?  The repo needs to have LICENSE and NOTICE anyway.  We don't have to 
have it be a separate release, we bundle flex-tlf with flex-sdk already.  And 
then, if we are going to do all of that work for the externs, should you ask 
for a repo for these tiny parts of Falcon and go through the hassle of LICENSE, 
NOTICE, README for them?

I'm really not sure where to draw the line.

Thoughts?
-Alex

Reply via email to