+1 On 7/15/16, 12:25 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>So I can take care of ordering the repo ... id call it "flex-typedefs" >... is that ok? We'll refrain from renaming the others for now and just >keep in mind that it would be cool to rename them some day. > > >Chris > >________________________________ >Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 21:22:36 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [Falcon] What would be needed in order to release >two tiny parts of Falcon? > >Hi Alex, > >the difference is that the externs will change, the "tiny parts" of >Falcon will probably never change. That's why I would simply like to fire >them out the door and only think about them if we really need to change >something. > >Chris > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 21:20 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Falcon] What would be needed in order to release >two tiny parts of Falcon? > > > >On 7/15/16, 11:38 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >>Hi Alex, >> >> >>In order to do a proper Maven release, there cannot be any SNAPSHOT >>dependencies in it. Currently we have these two snapshot versions in >>there. By releasing the artifacts in version 1.0.0 and leaving it this >>way, the road is clear to do a release of falcon. The other thing I >>would like to have done before triggering the release would be to >>detach the externs. I would like to have them in a separate repo for >>that. >> > >I don't think there were any objections to getting a new repo for the >externs, so please ask Infra for it. I'm still not sure it is worth the >cost of renaming the flex-asjs and flex-falcon repos. If we do get a >separate repo for externs, would we want to have it be a separate release >(with LICENSE, NOTICE, README)? The repo needs to have LICENSE and >NOTICE anyway. We don't have to have it be a separate release, we bundle >flex-tlf with flex-sdk already. And then, if we are going to do all of >that work for the externs, should you ask for a repo for these tiny parts >of Falcon and go through the hassle of LICENSE, NOTICE, README for them? > >I'm really not sure where to draw the line. > >Thoughts? >-Alex >
