On 7/27/16, 11:03 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The other piece of this is stage.getObjectsUnderPoint. > >It would be nice to wrap that as well. The question is where to do that. >HTMLElementWrapper as well? What about getting global objects? There’s no >“stage” is there? IMO, hitTestPoint and getObjectsUnderPoint (and hitTestObject) would not be in the base classes. It is possible to build working apps without them, and in JS, they are not on HTMLElement. Sure it can be more convenient to have it on the component, but we said that often enough for Flex that UIComponent is 13,000 lines long. Lately, I've been thinking that many of our XXXUtils classes and functionality like this should be presented as individual functions (like getDefinitionByName and getQualifiedClassName. Unless some state needs to be shared between similar implementations, individual functions don't drag in code that you aren't calling so they are more pay-as-you-go. My 2 cents, -Alex
