Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 binding as removing the license header on a 3rd party file is against ASF legal policy. [1] If this instance can be shown to acceptable within ASF policy and/or good reason given for its removal quite happy to change my vote to +1 for this RC. Would also change my vote to +1 if the header was left intact.
Just to reminder that a -1 is not a veto, a release only needs 3 +1 and more +1s than -1s to be made a release. People can keep voting and people can change their votes at any time, including those who previously voted +1. I checked: - signatures and hashed good - LICENSE and NOTICE ok - all source files have ASF headers - no unexpected binary files in source release - can compile from source with ant - tests pass I did a quick check on the connivance binary release and couldn’t see any obvious issues. Thanks, Justin 1.http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
