Thanks for the explanation. My point is that flexjs-maven-plugin is not in the Ant-produced source package we are voting on so to be truly release compliant, the vote should also include the flexjs-maven-plugin sources which I think are found in what you describe below as #2?
If so, we can post a link to the sources Jar and the voters should consider that in their vote. Thanks, -Alex On 9/6/16, 12:01 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >The Maven release-build usually produces 3 4 archives for each Maven >module: > >1) The Jar itself > >2) Sources Jar containing the sources and resources of the module but in >a structure that matches that of the classes in the normal jar (This is >used by IntelliJ and Eclipse to auto-download and display the sources of >thirdparty libs) > >3) JavaDoc containing the JavaDocs of the module > >4) A sources-release zip which is a zipped up version of the module >itself. This should be buildable if all the dependencies are available. > > >Chris > > >________________________________ >Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 08:52:31 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1 > >I looked over the artifacts and noticed that the flexjs-maven-plugin >sources are not in the source package. However, it appears the >flexjs-maven-plugin sources are in the source.jar for flexjs-maven-plugin, >so I think we can just consider that source.jar as one of the artifacts. > >BTW, I am thinking that if we have a majority vote by my Wednesday that >we'll call it done and push things so the mirrors can get a head start >before Chris's presentation on Thursday. > >On 9/5/16, 7:39 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>This is the discussion thread. >> >>Thanks, >>Alex Harui >
