Hi, > While you are technically correct, I'd still ship this RC.
So you’re advocating ignoring the terms of a 3rd party license and ignoring ASF policy on releases? I’ll let Chris speak for himself but I’m sure he can use a snapshot / nightly release for this talk so I don’t think here’s no real need for expediency here. > For the FlatUI bundle, I did not see an MIT License in their repo. If it is MIT licensed then you need as per the terms of the license to add the copyright and text of the licenses. It’s also ASF legal and release policy. If you want an exception you would probably need to ask VP legal before making an release. I've seen that been granted (usually as a one off) in the past. > We could cut another RC with the part of the OpenFL license that applies > copied into our LICENSE and have a short vote on it. +1 to that plus adding FlatUI license text. Given the changes would be minimal from the last RC I can’t see the vote taking much time and existing votes carrying over. Thanks, Justin
