I have to disagree with Olaf here. In our company the entire backend is using AMFPHP. Changing that to JSON and changing the frontend code as well is not a viable option. If AMFPHP works in FlexJS there would not be any changed required on both ends. Just making a point here that use cases indeed differ but for some companies it might be a key point in deciding wether or not to go forward with FlexJS.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 27 okt. 2016 om 20:38 heeft OK <p...@olafkrueger.net> het volgende > geschreven: > > Hey Carlos, > > > Carlos Rovira wrote >> Hi Olaf, I think is more about efficiency and optimization. AMF is binary, >> more compacted and faster that any other method I known out there. > > Yes, Flex/AMF is definately faster and I remember the discussions years ago > about AMF regarding performance. But even if it's faster I'm not sure if you > really notice it cause often there're other bottle necks that slow down > things. > More over I think it depends on the use case to be really profit by the > performance lead of AMF. > > Don't get me wrong, it would be great if FlexJS will support AMF but I'd > also like to say that the current lack of AMF support is no show stopper > that makes it impossible to use FlexJS. > In best case people maybe could just add a facade on top of their current > backend to be able to speak JSON over http. > > Anyway, you are my MDL super hero, thanks again for working on it !!! ;-) > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/AMFPHP-support-for-FlexJS-tp56066p56087.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
