We could just fill HTML and HTML5 with the direct wrappers of elements. Currently we are using more Flex-familiar names like Container and Label. If we can think of a better SWC name for those things that's fine. The point of HTML and Basic was that Harbs was finding it easier to work on his app with a library that wrapped all Sprites. I want to make sure we don't have to wrap all Sprites on the SWF side and am making compiler changes to allow for that. Hopefully then we can remove the wrapped Sprites, but it is a good exercise to have both just to make sure we don't have too many assumptions in the other SWCs. You never know when there might be a third platform besides SWF and JS that we want to target.
-Alex On 12/5/16, 7:41 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote: >Maybe we should have HTML just be the <js:DIV>, <js:H1>, etc. components >that were recently introduced. Have HTML5 product be additional >HTML5-specific components, and leave Basic to be the original set. > >This way you would layer as needed: if you wanted a static-ish HTML page >that had dynamics created with ActionScript, then you would use the HTML >project. You could then add in jQuery or whatever to that. > >If you wanted to introduce layouts and more complex UI elements, you would >add in Basic. If you didn't need DIV and H1 at all, then you'd just use >Basic. I think sorting these into more useful functional groups would >help. > >‹ >Peter Ent >Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project > >On 12/5/16, 6:26 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" ><carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > >>Hi Sankar >> >>1. Why the 'Basic' and 'HTML' folders when holding almost same files? >>> >> >>Basic is a deprecated project. When Alex and Harbs made the sprite >>refactor >>it was disconnected from build. I think Alex is working on it and he said >>rest of us could operate with Core, HTML and the rest of projects. So >>don't >>take account on Basic project >> >> >>> 2. When we call DataItemRenderer in our codes, I noticed it referenced >>>from >>> /frameworks/libs/HTML.swc - does that mean the swc contains #2 URL >>>file? >>> >> >>If I understand right, yes, DataItemRenderer comes from HTML.swc (is >>contained in that library swc) >> >>-- >>Carlos Rovira >>http://about.me/carlosrovira >
