On 12/12/16, 8:37 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I think most developers would be >more comfortable writing a few classes in ActionScript for a third-party >library, Agreed, because not only do you get type-checking, but you also get to "bullet-proof" the API. For these JS libraries that you pass a plain object to that has to have certain properties with certain values, you can define a type for it with appropriate defaults and constants so you don't make typos, don't pass the wrong thing into the wrong method, etc. So there are two ideas, not mutually exclusive, on the table right now: 1) Add an externs output type that only COMPJS would recognize. It would skip the goog.provide and goog.requires output and maybe automatically package any .JS files into a SWC. 2) Allow an @externs ASDoc annotation that would cause the compiler to use the output JS file as an extern. Then you don't need to actually build a SWC. You would be designating certain files in your project's source code as an extern. IMO, we want to encourage folks to build out re-usable SWCs to be shared with the community, but this option might be the lowest barrier for some, especially if you have to hook into some in-house JS library. Other ideas are welcome. -Alex