I suspect that a big chunk of the duplicate code is related to the Basic and HTML projects. As I understand it, HTML was forked from Basic to try a different architecture approach, but a big portion of the code is still the same.
- Josh On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Ok … so the results aren’t that bad at all … > > Typedefs: > 1 Bug > 1 Vulnerability > 308 Code Smells > > Framework: > 17 Bugs > 86 Vulnerabilities > 8500 Code Smells (A lot is probably related to the conditional compilation) > 35% of duplicated code > > 35% of duplicated code seems to indicate we could reuse quite a lot of > that code but I haven’t looked into that. > I added the missing configuration to the typedefs and framework modules > and opened a ticket to install the Flex plugin to SonarQube. > > Chris > > > Am 26.12.16, 15:50 schrieb "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > > Thank you. Looking forward to the results. > > Piotr > > > > ----- > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube- > available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > >
