Hi,

I didn’t check the licensing … but eventually it could still be cool to keep an 
eye on them and eventually help make the open-source version support FlexJS.
This way people that want to use FontAwesome 5 (free or pro) with FlexJS could 
start right away.

Chris

Am 04.01.17, 09:33 schrieb "omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash 
Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von bigosma...@gmail.com>:

    From the looks of it, FontAwesome 5 looks like a completely new project
    with the same name/versioning system.
    
    I say we stick with FontAwesome 4.7 and hence the current Apache friendly
    licences.
    
    FlexJS users can buy fontawesome 5 and easily build their own library out
    of it.
    
    Thanks,
    Om
    
    On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Font Awesome 5 has a different license and I think even the “free” one is
    > not an Apache-compatible license.
    >
    > There’s probably some way to have a optional “opt-in” for Font Awesome 5,
    > but ultimately the best way to support that might be outside of Apache.
    >
    > On Jan 3, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
    > wrote:
    >
    > > And eventually over this year FontAwesome 5 will be published with a lot
    > of OpenSource extensions (because the Kickstarter Campaign went so well)
    > > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/232193852/font-awesome-5
    > >
    > > Here the most interesting parts for the “Free” version:
    > >
    > > Funded!!! We’ll add our most-awesome Pro-only code features (but not the
    > Pro icons) to Font Awesome Free! That means we’ll open source our
    > super-awesome SVG Framework AND we’ll make all of our JavaScript component
    > packages available as well! More sprinkles for everyone!
    > >
    > > Funded! For React, Angular, Ember.js, and Vue.js, we’ll make
    > framework-native JavaScript components installable through your favorite
    > package manager (npm, yarn) for FA Pro. Free for all of our Pro backers!
    > >
    > > Funded! We'll include basic SVG files for free in Font Awesome 5 Free!
    > This won't include any of our SVG framework magic, but should make using
    > Font Awesome Free easier on the desktop and for folks who love SVG!
    > >
    > > 46 Icon Packs Funded! For every icon category pack, we'll add 10 more
    > icons to Font Awesome Free and another 30 more icons to Font Awesome Pro.
    > These icon packs are available for free for all Pro backers, but will cost
    > $10 each after the Kickstarter. Support now and save!
    > >
    > > Chris
    > >
    > > Am 03.01.17, 21:12 schrieb "carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
    > Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
    > carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>:
    > >
    > >    I think that would be a great addition Om. Thanks for working on
    > that! :)
    > >
    > >    2017-01-03 20:00 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com
    > >:
    > >
    > >> Just a heads-up, I have started working on a FontAwesome library for
    > >> FlexJS.  Some basic code is here, in case someone wants to take a peek:
    > >> https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/feature/fontawesome
    > >>
    > >> I needed font awesome icons for the Flex Team Page app I have been
    > building
    > >> using FlexJS and MDL.  I thought it would be a good addition.
    > >>
    > >> Thanks,
    > >> Om
    > >>
    > >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> On 8/25/16, 11:56 PM, "OK" <p...@olafkrueger.net> wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>> Got it, thanks for explanation Alex!
    > >>>>
    > >>>> But one question is left:
    > >>>> What is the difference between just loading a font and embedding a
    > font?
    > >>>> I thought "embedded" means that the font is delivered with our Flex
    > >>>> application so that it don't rely to
    > >>>> the client machine [1].
    > >>>> But if we able to just load the font and use it with FlexJS for me it
    > >>>> seems
    > >>>> that's pretty ok.
    > >>>> So what would "embedding" mean in this context and what advantages
    > would
    > >>>> font "embedding" have?
    > >>>
    > >>> True embedding means that the font data is encoded into the SWF or
    > >> HTML/JS
    > >>> file and not a separate request to the server.
    > >>> Loading means a separate request for the server.  It turns out that in
    > >> our
    > >>> current loading of a font SWF the font is embedded into the separate
    > font
    > >>> SWF.
    > >>>
    > >>> HTH,
    > >>> -Alex
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >    --
    > >
    > >    Carlos Rovira
    > >    Director General
    > >    M: +34 607 22 60 05
    > >    http://www.codeoscopic.com
    > >    http://www.avant2.es
    > >
    > >    Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede
    > contener
    > >    información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje
    > por
    > >    error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma
    > vía y
    > >    proceda a su destrucción.
    > >
    > >    De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
    > comunicamos
    > >    que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
    > CODEOSCOPIC
    > >    S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
    > >    servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
    > >    rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
    > nuestras
    > >    oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la
    > documentación
    > >    necesaria.
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to