On 1/7/17, 10:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> I'm willing to help, but please help us help you. The subject line is >> confusing. I assume you tested the CI build and not some RC? > >The CI build is currently passing and the 4.16 develop branch is >identical to the CI. I tested the 4.16 develop branch. > >> Earlier you referenced some issue and I don't recall what the issue is. > >There were some issues downloading 3rd party bits as part of the build, >it works for me but I’ve not tested on windows so their may still be an >issue there. > >Re subject lines I though it was decided to only have one discussion >thread on releases? The subject line says RC1. IMO, we should be testing the CI build, not RC1. The wiki [1] says that people are supposed to "test the artifacts available on the CI server". And, those artifacts should be coming from the 'release' branch, not the develop branch. Is the wiki confusing in some way? IMO, iF we want others to volunteer to be RMs, we should make sure the wiki isn't confusing and follow it so there isn't confusion about what it says and what RMs actually do. FWIW, last night (for me), I tested the CI artifacts on OSX and was able to build the CI's source artifact on Windows. -Alex [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/A+guide+to+the+Apache+Flex +release+process
