If we're not on par, I'd say we're very close. Someone should give the
Maven distribution a try with Flash Builder. That's the strictest IDE, in
terms of deciding if a Flex SDK is valid or not.

- Josh

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> Does that mean, that we finally managed to get the Maven distribution on
> par with the Ant one? … *PARTY* :-)
>
> Chris
>
> Am 24.01.17, 17:03 schrieb "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com>:
>
>     Hi Carlos,
>
>     I don't notice anything that seems missing in your instructions.
> Basically,
>     once you create a binary distribution with Maven, VSCode will now
> treat it
>     as a valid SDK, the same as if the distribution were built with Ant
>     instead. No extra steps on the VSCode side.
>
>     - Josh
>
>     On Jan 24, 2017 4:58 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     just see that NextGenAS 0.3.0 was available and updated in order to
> set up
>     with maven distribution.
>
>     This is most a step by step to see if I'm configuring it ok and to help
>     others to get to it:
>
>     1.- First I create a maven flexjs sdk distribution with the instruction
>     here:
>     https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/
> Building+FlexJS+with+Maven
>     in flex-asjs I put:
>
>     mvn -s settings-template.xml
>     -DdistributionTargetFolder={pathToDistributionDirectory} -P
>     build-distribution clean install
>
>     for example, my {pathToDistributionDirectory} is my sdks folder:
>     /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/sdks/
>
>     2.- As distribution is created, I go to
>     distribution/target/apache-flex-flexjs-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip and
> unzip it
>     in the same folder.
>
>     3.- When open VSCode it warns me about to update settings to:
>
>     {
>         "nextgenas.sdk.editor":
>     "/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flex/sdks/distribution/target/
>     apache-flex-flexjs-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/"
>     }
>
>     4.- Then I restart VSCode.
>
>     Is this guide ok? or I'm missing something?
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>     http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>

Reply via email to