Hmm. IIRC, there was a playerglobal.swc that was packaged differently than the others, but I can't find it.
Harbs, can you send me off-list your playerglobal.swc? /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/frameworks/libs/player/11.1/playerglobal. swc Thanks, -Alex On 1/30/17, 7:46 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >Crap. You are hitting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35203 > >Which I thought I'd fixed but I guess not. > >I'll push a fix today. > >-Alex > >On 1/30/17, 1:39 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>FWIW, Yishay’s falcon is from about a month ago. He’s getting (two) >>goog.requires for XML. I’m using an ant build (and not Maven) in case >>that makes a difference. >> >>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I added a bunch of System.outs to see what’s going on: >>> http://pastebin.com/Wr4xMDaT >>> >>> The way it looks to me is that there’s no goog.require being added for >>>XML. So although it sees XML in the asEmitter used names, it’s not found >>>as a require. Even if it would, without the goog.require, the code will >>>fail anyway. >>> >>> So the question is why the goog.require is not being added. >>> >>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hmm. Well it sees that XML is a usedName. >>>> >>>> You can see on commits@ my last changes to MXMLFlexJSEmitter.java. I >>>>have >>>> to stop working for tonight, so it will probably be most efficient if >>>>you >>>> sprinkle more System.out.println calls throughout that postProcess() >>>> method to see why the requires for XML are not going in, or going in >>>>and >>>> removed. >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/29/17, 11:35 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry about that. >>>>> >>>>> Here’s the output for the test: >>>>> >>>>> http://pastebin.com/f8BpVwDJ >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The test project looks like it compiled against the nightly build >>>>>>and >>>>>> thus >>>>>> didn't emit the extra output? When you compiled DataBindingExample, >>>>>>it >>>>>> had the extra output and compiled against the repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/29/17, 1:12 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here’s what I get for the test project: >>>>>>> http://pastebin.com/XXCdPYxi >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
