So great Chris! :) 2017-02-09 10:13 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>:
> And I just pushed an archetype for a typedef … so now the list shoud be > complete (At least for now) > > Chris > > Am 08.02.17, 17:58 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: > > And I just committed an updated version of the > flexjs-simple-library-archetype > … I noticed we already had an archetype for that … unfortunately it was > broken, so I re-created it. This time I also added some classes, manifests > and conditional compilation: > > There are 3 classes in there: > - UniversalClass (Included in Flash and JavaScript) > - FlashClass (Included only in Flash) > - JavaScriptClass (Included only in JavaScript) > > The manifest only references UniversalClass so the classes in the > catalog should only have the namespace on this class. > > Additionally, I added some methods to UniversalClass which are > available in both, only Flash and only JavaScript to demonstrate some other > parts. > > I think it should be a good starting point … please have a look, give > feedback and improve ☺ > > Chris > > > Am 08.02.17, 09:15 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" < > [email protected]>: > > Hi Carlos, > > Well bringing all three repos into one would be a cool thing and > shouldn’t have too big implications. > One problem I have observed to have increased greatly in the last > few months (Don’t know what changed though). > If I build jars that are required as/in plugins in other parts of > the build, maven now fails deterministically. A year ago I was using the > same Maven version but I got random failures at about 10% of my builds. Now > I get failures at 100%. I don’t know if it’s changes to the Java VM or the > OS. But I get loads of ClassNotFoundExceptions because the classloader > thinks a jar is empty if it is replaced during the builds. > > I just had to refactor Flexmojos build into a plugin and framework > build (the same way I split up FlexJS) to be able to build at all. > > Currently I’m thinking of highjacking the maven-invoker-plugin to > run all three builds separately (I’m using the invoker plugin in the > framework/testsuite module. > > Regarding a fourth type of archetype … I agree … and while at it, > I think a fifth containing a typedef would be good too. Archetypes are easy > to create. Just have a look at the existing ones. But I’d be happy to help > if you are stuck. > > Chris > > > Am 07.02.17, 20:41 schrieb "[email protected] im Auftrag > von Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] im Auftrag von > [email protected]>: > > Hi Chris, > > just want to ask you about: > > 1.- What about to create a Maven Archetype to setup a library > project > (SWC)? I think this is missed and is needed as with others > > 2.- I think you talked in the past about to group the 3 maven > repos into > one build (although still being able to build it separately). > It seems to > me that this should not be very difficult right? > Or maybe there's something implied that makes it not possible? > > Thanks > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
