+1 Java 1.7 OS: 10.9.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y
Binary kit signatures match: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y No unapproved binaries in binary package: y ASDoc seems to have content. Thanks for sticking with it! -Alex On 3/5/17, 2:18 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >This is Apache Flex 4.16 release candidate 3. Please see the >RELEASE_NOTES and the README. > >There are minimal changes from the last RC mostly to do with how saxon is >downloaded. > >The release candidate can be found here; >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.0/rc3/ ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.0/rc> > >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on >approving a release?", at: >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release> > >At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >- MD5 and signed packages are correct >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >- That you can compile from source package >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser >application > >Please vote to approve this release: >+1 Approve the release >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why) > >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > >The vote passes if there is: >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >- More positive votes than negative votes > >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please don't >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want to >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during >the voting process. > >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the >PMC votes. > >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR >version you tested the SDK with. > >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not >this VOTE thread. > >Thanks, >Justin
