On 3/14/17, 9:54 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Alex, I agree, it seems whatever prompted this was elsewhere, but the >outcome is IMO (a small amount of) better framework code in CSSUtils. >I would take this as a small win - nothing is broken, and a utility method >is theoretically slightly faster. I am still confused. If the compiler should output JS that specifies 10 for the second parameter if not specified because that will net better/faster code we should definitely do that. But I don't understand any reason to actually add the second parameter in the ActionScript source. Thanks, -Alex
