Sure. But the world turned anti-Flash. If Flash == Adobe, then the world is anti-Adobe. Not a place a company wants to be…
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Alain Ekambi <jazzmatad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure Flash/Flex was nt making lots of money for them. But still. I think > the are making tons of money somewhere else. And nice ecosystem of devs is > always nice for a company. Not sure if that would have hurt thier current > business. > > This is such a great piece of then. It s really bad to see it slowly go > away like that. > > 10 years later i still have huge problem centering a button in a div > > On 15 March 2017 at 12:35, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Adobe does not make much (any?) money from Flash. >> >> If they only stand to gain bad press by pushing it, it’s not in their best >> interests. >> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Alain Ekambi <jazzmatad...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Still wondering what s was the logic behind Adobe just Dumping Flex/Flash >>> support like that. Still wondering ... >>> >>> On 15 March 2017 at 10:55, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Talking about our company (Codeoscopic), we continue with Flex since >> still >>>> there's no other option in HTML world that give us the same we have in >>>> Flex world. It's not only about going HTML, is the productivity you >> loose >>>> in that world, and we can't move to another technology that is clearly a >>>> step back of what we have today with Flex. >>>> >>>> Apache FlexJS is what we are trying to do to get a similar scenario, and >>>> hope we could get a great tech ready for the years to come and to have >> more >>>> options while preserving the same productivity. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-03-15 10:25 GMT+01:00 Vincent <vinc...@after24.net>: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We are a team of two peoples and we still actively use Flex (desktop >> and >>>>> mobile) for our clients needs. >>>>> >>>>> Vincent. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 15/03/2017 à 08:58, OK a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Same here, the situation could be (always) better but it's much better >>>>>> than >>>>>> I've expected. >>>>>> We're still using AS3/Flex even for new apps and as long there's at >>>>>> minimum >>>>>> one runtime environment available I have no concerns with it... Flex >> is >>>> to >>>>>> powerful to throw it way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, I think any kind of software/framework out there has its >>>>>> dependencies and it's always a good idea to be prepared for some >> future >>>>>> scenarios ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Olaf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development >>>>>> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/I-am-curious-what-do-you-guys- >>>>>> think-about-Flash-Player-and-Flash-Platform-s-situation- >>>>>> today-is-it-be-tp60394p60462.html >>>>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Carlos Rovira >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Alain Ekambi >>> >>> Co-Founder >>> >>> Ahomé Innovation Technologies >>> >>> http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/> >> >> > > > -- > > Alain Ekambi > > Co-Founder > > Ahomé Innovation Technologies > > http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/>
