On 3/16/17, 3:51 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>So typedefs produce only the js version? It should help make the Maven >plugin simpler and the build easier to understand. So thumbs up for that. >If I can help with the step in embedding the js in the "normal" one, just >let me know. IMO, typedefs swcs from flex-typedefs are different from the -js.swc. In a -js.swc, the cross-compiled JS output is functional and goes in the js/out folder in the swc package. In a typedefs swc, the JS files are not always cross-compiled, and they go in an externs folder in the swc package. The js is not functional. So I left both a typedefs and js classifier around in the dual maven plugin. Also, typedefs swcs go on the external-library-path while -js.swcs go on the library-path. Thoughts? -Alex > >Chris > > > >Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > >-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >Datum: 16.03.17 10:52 (GMT-05:00) >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: [FlexJS] Dual branch > > > >On 3/16/17, 4:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >>so i understand it correctly in the dual branch, the compiler produces >>one swc per type? And if you do pure js you use the js-swcs and if flash, >>you use the normal swcs? > >Yes. That is correct. > >Thanks, >-Alex >
