Can I assume that any types in external swcs will not have this issue?

> On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/28/17, 9:58 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> OK. Why is this happening now?
> 
> In order to handle the reordering of dependencies, I needed to collect
> types used in static initializers.  The code is throwing a big net over
> all sorts of identifiers.  I suppose I need to make it smarter, not sure.
> 
> But it could just be that NativeUtils should contain all of these JS
> "types".  Although I'm a bit surprised to see NaN in there.
> 
> -Alex
> 

Reply via email to