+1

On Mar 30, 2017 6:12 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> +1 (Just noticed I didn’t actually vote ;-) )
>
> I agree with Tom … next release will have it fixed anyway.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 30.03.17, 13:45 schrieb "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com>:
>
>     +1 - the headers is not a serious enough issue to hold up the release.
>
>     Tom
>
>
>     On 27/03/17 22:13, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > This is Apache Flex BlazeDS 4.7.3 release candidate 1.
>     >
>     > RELEASE NOTES:
>     >
>     > Apache Flex BlazeDS 4.7.3 is an update to 4.7.2 which adds a new
>     > blazeds-spring-boot-starter module for easily setting up a BlazeDS
> server with
>     > Spring Boot. It also provides Maven archetypes for easily creating
> new spring-boot
>     > project that make use of BlazeDS. We also did quite a lot of
> fine-tuning of the
>     > security default settings to make BlazeDS more secure.
>     >
>     > Starting with 4.7.3 BlazeDS Deserialization of XML is disabled
> completely per default
>     > but can easily be enabled in your services-config.xml:
>     >
>     >      <channels>
>     >          <channel-definition id="amf" class="mx.messaging.channels.
> AMFChannel">
>     >              <endpoint url="http://{server.name}:{
> server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/amf"
>     >                        class="flex.messaging.
> endpoints.AMFEndpoint"/>
>     >              <properties>
>     >                  <serialization>
>     >                      <allow-xml>true</allow-xml>
>     >                  </serialization>
>     >              </properties>
>     >          </channel-definition>
>     >      </channels>
>     >
>     > Also we now enable the ClassDeserializationValidator per default to
> only allow
>     > deserialization of whitelisted classes. BlazeDS internally comes
> with the following
>     > whitelist:
>     >
>     >      flex.messaging.io.amf.ASObject
>     >      flex.messaging.io.amf.SerializedObject
>     >      flex.messaging.io.ArrayCollection
>     >      flex.messaging.io.ArrayList
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.AcknowledgeMessage
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.AcknowledgeMessageExt
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.AsyncMessage
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.AsyncMessageExt
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.CommandMessage
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.CommandMessageExt
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.ErrorMessage
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.HTTPMessage
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.RemotingMessage
>     >      flex.messaging.messages.SOAPMessage
>     >      java.lang.Boolean
>     >      java.lang.Byte
>     >      java.lang.Character
>     >      java.lang.Double
>     >      java.lang.Float
>     >      java.lang.Integer
>     >      java.lang.Long
>     >      java.lang.Object
>     >      java.lang.Short
>     >      java.lang.String
>     >      java.util.ArrayList
>     >      java.util.Date
>     >      java.util.HashMap
>     >      org.w3c.dom.Document
>     >
>     > If you need to deserialize any other classes, be sure to register
> them in your
>     > services-config.xml:
>     >
>     >      <validators>
>     >          <validator class="flex.messaging.validators.
> ClassDeserializationValidator">
>     >              <properties>
>     >                  <allow-classes>
>     >                      <class name="org.mycoolproject.*"/>
>     >                      <class name="flex.messaging.messages.*"/>
>     >                      <class name="flex.messaging.io.amf.ASObject"/>
>     >                  </allow-classes>
>     >              </properties>
>     >          </validator>
>     >      </validators>
>     >
>     > (Beware, by manually providing a whitelist the default whitelist is
> disabled)
>     >
>     > Known Issues
>     > _____________
>     > FLEX-34648 Memory Leak occurred in AsyncMessage when sending a lot
> of messages
>     >
>     > ------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
>     >
>     > The release candidate can be found here:
>     > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheflex-1019/org/apache/flex/blazeds/blazeds/4.7.3/
> blazeds-4.7.3-source-release.zip<https://repository.apache.
> org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1019/org/apache/
> flex/blazeds/blazeds/4.7.3/>
>     >
>     > Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF
> requirements on
>     > approving a release?", at: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> release.html#approving-a-release
>     >
>     > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>     > - MD5 and signed packages are correct
>     > - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>     > - That you can compile from source package
>     > - That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
>     > - That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
>     > application
>     >
>     > Please vote to approve this release:
>     > +1 Approve the release
>     > -1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to
> why)
>     >
>     > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>     >
>     > The vote passes if there is:
>     > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>     > - More positive votes than negative votes
>     >
>     > If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please
> don't
>     > hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we
> want to
>     > try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
>     > release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote
> during
>     > the voting process.
>     >
>     > People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the
> release and
>     > vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence
> how the
>     > PMC votes.
>     >
>     > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Java- and Maven Version,
> you
>     > tested BlazeDS with.
>     >
>     > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION
> thread not
>     > this VOTE thread.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >        Chris
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ____________________________________________________________
> __________
>     > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
>     > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>     > ____________________________________________________________
> __________
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to