Justin, you are welcome to contact the original authors and find out more. But please don't expect the release process to wait till we figure this out.
We can fix license headers in a subsequent release if needed. I would rather Alex and Harbs continue their coding, prepping for release, etc instead of spending more time on this issue. Thanks, Om On Apr 23, 2017 8:00 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: My point is that it does not matter which came from where. Even if you are right (which I doubt — Mike Chambers probably just took most of the code from existing code bases) the code was owned by Adobe (since it was written by an Adobe employee whether Mike Chambers or someone else) and Adobe donated it to Apache under the Apache license. We have no reason to question their right to do so. I don’t know what other licensing issues you refer to, so I can’t respond to that, but in this case I see no reason to do anything. Thanks, Harbs > On Apr 23, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >> You have no way of determining that the original came from as3corelib and not the other way around. > > Yes we do we can ask the people involved. Also look at the github dates, for instance the license was updated in 2008. [1] > > Alex has requested the same on other licensing issues so why should this be different? > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://github.com/mikechambers/as3corelib/commits/ 24c6c16aecbf0d8fcc043ae671e689b0d4b4c559/tests/src/com/ adobe/crypto/MD5Test.as
