Hi,
Just profiled these with a variety of inputs and the first is around 3 times as
fast as the second.
I added a null check to stop the RTE, if the null check is not needed it can be
removed from both.
public function test(str:String):Number {
var pixels:Number = NaN;
if (str !== null && str.indexOf('%') === -1)
pixels = parseFloat(str);
return pixels;
}
public function test2(str:String):Number {
var pixels:Number;
if (str !== null && str.indexOf('%') != -1)
pixels = NaN;
else if (str !== null && str.length == 0)
pixels = NaN;
else
pixels = parseFloat(str);
return pixels;
}
Thanks,
Justin