View beads have @viewbead ASDoc tag Top-level components have @toplevel ASDoc tag.
All tags are output to tags.json and the ASDoc example could implement any sort of filtering based on those tags. New tags I think can be added by just adding them to the ASDoc and maybe telling the compiler to hide it from Google Closure. That's why I see the need for something that is more of an "application" for our documentation. The app can compute relationships based on data. Volunteers are encouraged to improve this capability for our ASDoc. We also probably need to solve search engine interfaces for the app as well. BTW, I got the ASDoc in the CI server to work again. Here are links to the SWF version [1] and JS version[2]. -Alex [1] http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/FlexJS_ASDoc_Example/lastSucce ssfulBuild/artifact/examples/flexjs/ASDoc/bin-debug/ASDoc.html [2] http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/FlexJS_ASDoc_Example/lastSucce ssfulBuild/artifact/examples/flexjs/ASDoc/bin/js-debug/index.html On 6/6/17, 8:46 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >What do the annotations look like? > >Maybe there should be some kind of manifest that documents beads and >their relationships? > > >> On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> Definitely needs more. >> >> In the ASDoc example, there is a checkbox to see just view beads. I >>have >> added ASDoc annotations to the view beads so they show up when that >>filter >> is on. I'm sure view beads may have been added since I first did that, >> and maybe the annotation accidentally got copied into new beads that >> aren't view beads, but that's my idea for how to find tools in the >>toolbox. >> >> If folks like it, please add more annotations and propose and implement >> how to generalize the filtering so it isn't 40 checkboxes some day. >> >> BTW, the ASDoc example on the CI server is broken. That'll be my >> stop-ship release bug for today. Until then, you can build the example >> locally and see how the checkbox works. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> On 6/5/17, 10:58 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> One of the most difficult part of dealing with FlexJS and beads is >>> knowing what beads are available and what beads are interchangeable. >>> >>> I think we need a system to programmatically be able to look up bead >>>and >>> strand relationships. This could be used by documentation as well as >>> tooling to give hints as to what beads to use. >>> >>> I think there’s been some discussion already on this, but I’m kind of >>> fuzzy and it probably needs some more. >>> >>> Harbs >> >
