Yes but in examples/flexjs/CordovaCameraExample, it specifies 11.4 and swfversion 17. Anyone who wants to use a later API than our baseline can do that.
-Alex On 7/4/17, 11:30 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Where is that from? > >In build.properties I see this: > ># flex-sdk-description values >release.name = Apache Flex (FlexJS) ># this is the version that appears in the flex-sdk-description ><description> tag ># and on the package name. This is the publicly known version of FlexJS >release.version = 0.9.0 > ># fb.release.version must start with 4 in order for FB to accept it. ># intellij seems to want it to be at least 4.6 in order to not use certain ># older plugins that have incompatible Java APIs. We might as well keep ># the major/minor current with the version of FDB we are borrowing from ># the flex-sdk ># this property should only go in flex-sdk-description.xml <version> tag >fb.release.version = 4.14.1 > ># override on command line with -Dbuild.number=999 or in local.properties >build.number = 0 > ># Flash player version for which player global swc to use >playerglobal.version = 11.1 > ># AIR version number >air.version = 14.0 > >> On Jul 5, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> Which build? The Ant build is set for >> >> <property name="swf.version" value="17" /> >> <property name="playerglobal.version" value="11.4" /> >> >> -Alex >> >> On 7/4/17, 12:14 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com >><mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> I was having a problem building the Mobile package. It was complaining >>> about >>> line 151 in Camera.as which does camera.copyToByteArray(). Looking at >>>the >>> docs [1], it looks like this method became available in flash 11.4 >>>while >>> the >>> build is set to look for flash player 11.1 (under build.properties). >>> >>> So I changed to flash 25.0 and rebuilt, and Mobile passed. The funny >>>thing >>> is that after changing back to 11.1, the build now passes. >>> >>> In short, it looks to me like the flash player requirement should be >>> updated >>> to 11.4. >>> >>> What do you guys think? >>> >>> [1] >>> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhelp.ado >>>be >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhelp.ad >>>obe> >>> >>>.com%2Fen_US%2FFlashPlatform%2Freference%2Factionscript%2F3%2Fflash%2Fme >>>di >>> >>>a%2FCamera.html%23copyToByteArray&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9957eba96c8347ef1901 >>>08 >>> >>>d4c2aee848%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6363475038585349 >>>35 >>> &sdata=t2FKQyYZBDQzz1E4L6FVOGYTZObeTGuBx3xIMI%2FfXUk%3D&reserved=0() >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-f >>>le >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache- >>>fle> >>> x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fx-devel >>>opment.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2ae4650276b3461947dc08 >>>d4c36f6211%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6363483305299484 >>>16&sdata=NtbPWx1ixfXzbm3ViAz2hIu9Zt4tEH8kVcSmPoUierQ%3D&reserved=0>%2FFl >>>exJS-Mobile-Depends-on-Flash-11-4- >>> >>>tp62811.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C9957eba96c8347ef190108d4c2aee848%7Cfa7b1b >>>5a >>> >>>7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636347503858534935&sdata=%2BRDJB%2BVo >>>JU >>> AqIl1xxh6fniXZ4A5whl%2FFovxyZaaztfg%3D&reserved=0 >>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>>Nabble.com >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnabble. >>>com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2ae4650276b3461947dc08d4c36f6211%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34 >>>438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636348330529948416&sdata=gWaoiD50cLESEnTx >>>yBDGwsVR8pX8CDOjfSL8UdxZzCY%3D&reserved=0>. >
