I think we allow classes to be used as a "statement" for dependency management. CoreClasses.as, for example, has plenty of lines like:
import org.apache.flex.core.IUIBase; IUIBase; HTH, -Alex On 7/19/17, 6:57 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: >Yes, I'm changing the compiler. The debugger statement is not a function. >It works like this: > >debugger; > >I think that flash.system.System.pause() will work too, and it's >documented: > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhelp.adobe >.com%2Fen_US%2FFlashPlatform%2Freference%2Factionscript%2F3%2Fflash%2Fsyst >em%2FSystem.html%23pause&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7bb64776e6eb48b8d61908d4cf12d04 >e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636361127090455464&sdata=I2 >01iT7jr2mvseuvMIJdUVu1SpRLJimK7Tqdp3n%2B%2Bv8%3D&reserved=0() > >- Josh > >On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Are you changing the compiler? I thought you could just add: >> >> function debugger{}; >> >> to missing.js so it results in: >> >> public class debugger {}; >> >> and >> >> package flash.debugger { >> native function enterDebugger():void; >> } >> >> to one of our swcs? Although I have to say I'm a bit uncomfortable >>about >> adding undocumented Flash APIs to our code base. We are not supposed to >> use APIs that are "reverse-engineered". Do we have proof that Adobe >> documented it at one point in time? >> >> HTH, >> -Alex >> >> On 7/18/17, 5:05 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I'm working on adding support for the debugger statement to the >>compiler >> >(FLEX-35343). I can successfully emit the debugger statement in the >> >generated JS so far. >> > >> >I'm not yet sure if I can make it work on the SWF side. I figured out >> >where >> >I can generate bytecode instructions in ABCGeneratingReducer. If I can >> >figure out how to generate bytecode to call enterDebugger() (or >>whatever >> >the function is called), the debugger statement will work in both SWF >>and >> >JS. >> > >> >- Josh >> > >> >On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> If it were a variable or function, it could be defined somewhere like >> >> that. It's a statement, though, so it needs to be added to where >>Falcon >> >> creates the AST from the ActionScript code. Then, it also needs to >>emit >> >>the >> >> statement as JS in FalconJX. On the SWF side, it should be >>translated to >> >> appropriate bytecode to call enterDebugger(). >> >> >> >> - Josh >> >> >> >> On Jul 16, 2017 8:56 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> What needs to be modified? Does it need to be added to NativeJSType >> >>> enums? Somewhere else? >> >>> >> >>> I’m really not clear on when things to be added to that and when >>they >> >>> need to be in typedefs. >> >>> >> >>> > On Jul 16, 2017, at 6:51 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> The compiler needs to be modified to support the debugger >>statement. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>
