The setter for element is in HTMLElementWrapper, the super class for UIBase. The setter for flexes_wrapper is in UIBase. So if the element setter were to also set the flexjs_wrapper, it would have to be an override in UIBase to do it. At least that¹s how I understand it.
Could you elaborate a little more on the issue that is raising this concern? Your question made me scan through these classes. Looking at this code now makes me think we can do a better and more consistent job organizing it for Royale. After all, having code that can be quickly understood and modified is important. ‹peter On 9/26/17, 7:13 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Currently, setting the element of a IUIBase will not work correctly >because the flexjs_wrapper is not set. This makes it error prone when >there¹s a need to work with the underlying DOM elements for HTML output. > >I cannot think of a reason why the wrapper should not be set when calling >the element setter. Instead of setting the flexjs_wrapper in >createElement(), it seems to me that it should be set in the element >setter in HTMLElementWrapper. > >Anyone have a reason not to do this? > >Harbs
